|
|
Posted by nappy on 05/09/06 15:45
"nappy" <gospam@yourself.com> wrote in message
news:A0T7g.70013$F_3.54593@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
>
> "Mr. Tapeguy" <mr.tapeguy@pro-tape.com> wrote in message
> news:1147140502.492459.170250@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> Specs wrote:
>> .
>>> >
>>> My understanding of physics says retentivity is the more important
>>> factor of
>>> the two. Its pretty rich for someone to make note of the sparcity of
>>> critical information when they have steadfastly
>>> refused/incapable/unwilling
>>> to produce the mearest hint of information.
>>
>> Your understanding of physics? Are you a tape engineer? Are you
>> involved in the manufacturing process? Where did you gain this
>> understanding? Can you document that retentivity is more important?
>> Please produce some data to substantiate this.
>>
>> While you're brushing up on your physics you might try consulting a
>> dictionary to improve your spelling.
>
>
> translation: I can't muster up a legitimate debate poibnt so I will find
> something to nit pick.
>
> Tapedick. You really ought to fuck off.
Allright.. that was a little harsh.. I meant 'sod off'
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|