|
|
Posted by P.C. Ford on 05/10/06 16:06
On Wed, 10 May 2006 06:37:17 GMT, "Bill Farnsworth"
<bill.farnsworth@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>"Mr. Tapeguy" <mr.tapeguy@pro-tape.com> wrote:
> <<<<SNIP>>>>
>> If you want to engage in flaming you'll have to find another
>> playmate.
>> My presence here is intended to inform others and learn myself, not
>> trade insults. It's disappointing how the anonymity of being in
>> front
>> of a computer has led to the uncivil exchanges people wouldn't dare
>> have in person but we have the ability to rise above it. I would
>> implore you to join me in doing just that.
>>
>> Craig
>
>Craig,
> Fuggitaboutit.
>Nappy works at a Radio Shack in Raleigh, North Carolina.
>He's nothin'. Most of us kill-filed him a long time ago.
Sure, nappy is less than helpful. But that's beside the point. As
someone that recently had heads replaced on my 150 because of drops,
the question is much more immediate than merely academic.
Like Mr. Tapeguy says is the case in his part of the country.... most
of the guys 'round Seattle use Panasonic. When asked they trot out the
explanation of the wet versus dry lube. I think its pretty well
established that these days that explanation does not carry water.
We wanted Mr. Tapeguy to supply the data which he said he had. To this
date, he has not come up with it. I haven't flamed Mr. Tapeguy, but
other people interested in the subject and I would like to see the
data which shows that Panasonic is really the tape we should be using.
Simply saying "everybody uses it" ain't enough.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|