|
|
Posted by richard on 10/26/13 11:47
In article <cudex-5E4F34.12534213052006@news.the-edge.net.au>, cudex@yahoo.com
opined thusly:
>
>
>In article <opl8g.1292$S7.39@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
> richard <nomail@butterfly.net> wrote:
>
>> The other interesting difference is that the Z1 is a good 1-2 stops
>> slower, which surprised me as it has a bigger lens. Anyone have thoughts
>> on why this is? (We are currently using the Z1 in stanndard def 4:3
>> mode).
>
>How's the quality of the Z1 compared to the PD in SD? Could footage be
>intercut, bearing in mind the WB and difference in low-light scenes i.e.
>question of 2cam: 1 Z1 + 1 PD170P on a shoot.
We do intercut and I can't say we've scrutinised it that critically as we only
use the footage for web at 640x480. But we do balance them in post and nobody
has noticed yet.
Thanks everyone for their answers.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|