|
|
Posted by RichardK on 10/12/98 11:48
fred-bloggs wrote:
>>I can see absolutely no benefit whatsoever in having WMA-DRM. It's a
>>proprietary format with very few worthwhile sources and certainly not
>>something one would encode by choice. Or purchase by choice.
>>
>
>
> So when, hypothetically, the Beatles release their music on Urge(MTV) you
> wouldn't want to have the choice of downloading it onto your Ipod?
I hate the Beatles. I'm not 60, I'm not a hippy, and I'm not someone who
thinks that a bunch of manufactured shite revolutionised music. I hate
their unimaginative 'output', their no-brainer lyrics. I hate their
ubiquity and undeserved respect. If I could erase every memory of a
Beatles track from my mind, I would; especially if it also wiped out
Oasis and all these copycat acts.
Were The Beatles back cataloque to be released in WMA-DRM, I would be
pleased that very little I own could play it.
If I could make a list of people I could shoot for just being annoying,
Paul McCartney would be right next to Ben Elton and Michael Moore.
Unfortunately, I suspect that their turds are going to float to the
surface of iTMS before anything else; McCartney is nothing if not greedy
and utterly lacking in the talent required to produce new material, and
will want to use the most successful outlet.
Richard
--
RichardK - http://www.dmc12.demon.co.uk/ - retro, music, cars.
2006 Mazda RX8, 1992 Sera Phase III -= Do Not Tempt With New Cars =-
"If the thought of something makes me giggle for more than 15 seconds I
am to assume I am not allowed to do it". * 64 is 128 for email *
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|