|
|
Posted by Invid Fan on 05/29/06 15:26
In article <M5WdnRT_O4Kk9-fZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>, Joshua Zyber
<joshzyber@comcast.net> wrote:
> "Invid Fan" <invid@localnet.com> wrote in message
> news:280520062019245458%invid@localnet.com...
> >> Also worth noting is that Blade Runner has always been slightly
> >> flawed
> >> and in need of just a little bit of tweaking. The 1982 theatrical
> >> cuts
> >> had the bad voiceover and Stupid Happy Ending. The 1992 "Director's
> >> Cut"
> >> fixed those things but lost little pieces of violent footage that had
> >> been in the old European theatrical cut. There's never really been a
> >> "perfect" version of Blade Runner, and so fans have been willing to
> >> give
> >> Ridley Scott another chance to get it right.
> >>
> > His version won't have that "violent footage", most likely.
>
> What would make you think that? Scott's biggest complaint about the 1992
> "Director's Cut" was that it was missing that footage. If he's preparing
> a brand new "Final Cut", it stands to reason that he'll put back in
> anything he wants.
>
Ah. I assumed he had cut it from the original version himself. Probably
confused it with Robocop, where the director said he prefered the toned
down version (and I could be mistaken there too ^_^)
--
Chris Mack "Refugee, total shit. That's how I've always seen us.
'Invid Fan' Not a help, you'll admit, to agreement between us."
-'Deal/No Deal', CHESS
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|