|
Posted by Tricky Dicky on 05/30/06 22:26
"Ant C" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:127pd7aiau46694@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Tricky Dicky" <tricky@nospam.clara.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1149014438.25818.0@proxy01.news.clara.net...
>>
>> "the dog from that film you saw" <dsb@REMOVETHECAPITALSbtinternet.com>
>> wrote in message news:4e3du7F1atmqcU1@individual.net...
>>>
>>> "Brian Wescombe" <brian.wescombeSODOFF@ntlworldSPAM.com> wrote in
>>> message news:C2%eg.5210$zv2.2417@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...
>>>> Is there any difference between the UK release and the Unrated US
>>>> version? Or is the UK release the same as the US theatrical 'R' rated
>>>> version?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> only difference apparently is an extended view of the eyeball bit.
>>> and the director has admitted he only put it in as the studio asked for
>>> extra - the regular version is the directors cut really.
>>
>> A nasty film. Not seen anything comparable since the early eighties.
>> Proper viciousness and not jokey-tongue-in-cheek stuff
>>
>> I tell a lie, Sin City was pretty nasty as well
>>
>> Tricky
>
>
> Watch Wolf Creek if you've not seen it already.
I nearly <cough> downloaded that yesterday but did the bloody Da Vinci Code
instead - I knew it was going to be run-of-the-mill and it was - wish I had
gone for the horror, now
Tricky
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|