|
|
Posted by Invid Fan on 05/30/06 12:19
In article <18qohoyc8w2bb.eo9iio40fjay.dlg@40tude.net>, Ian Galbraith
<me@privacy.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 May 2006 08:29:07 -0400, Joshua Zyber wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > Also worth noting is that Blade Runner has always been slightly flawed
> > and in need of just a little bit of tweaking. The 1982 theatrical cuts
> > had the bad voiceover and Stupid Happy Ending. The 1992 "Director's Cut"
> > fixed those things but lost little pieces of violent footage that had
> > been in the old European theatrical cut. There's never really been a
> > "perfect" version of Blade Runner, and so fans have been willing to give
> > Ridley Scott another chance to get it right.
>
> So there's the theatrical cut, the 1992 Directors Cut and the new
> Directors Cut. Whats the 4th cut?
>
The European theatrical cut mentioned above, with the extra violence
that probably would have given the film an X rating in the US.
--
Chris Mack "Refugee, total shit. That's how I've always seen us.
'Invid Fan' Not a help, you'll admit, to agreement between us."
-'Deal/No Deal', CHESS
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|