|
|
Posted by Justin on 06/02/06 00:56
GMAN wrote on [Fri, 02 Jun 2006 00:09:23 GMT]:
> In article <e5mpmp$9rg$1@reader1.panix.com>, urban@panix.com (Michael Urban) wrote:
>>In article <1149106233.785832.46210@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
>> <jeffy3@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>I was 13 when it came out and I remember that it played in a lot of the
>>>same theaters for more than a year. In fact, a special birthday cake
>>>poster was issued on the one year anniversary. Even TITANIC only
>>>seemed to play for maybe four months. A different world today, I
>>>suppose, with so many more screens.
>>>
>>
>>The big difference is, of course, home video. When the movie
>>is out on DVD within three months, the theatrical market
>>has to be short-lived. Frankly, I am glad I am not a theatre
>>owner in the present market.
> Why? The theaters make their money off the concession stands.
Why got the the theatre if it's out in 3 months?
Do the theatre owners have to pay more in fees to the studios for more
movies per year now? etc
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|