|
|
Posted by Larry, Darryl and Darryl on 09/29/48 11:49
Excellent idea! thanks for the advise, ken.
--
--Larry, Darry, and Darryl
To reply directly remove "nothpam" from bexley@videotron.nothpam.ca
<getken@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1149346866.872825.229900@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> I would pose the question on the DVXUser.com site...specifically in the
> technical section under HVX 200
> http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/forumdisplay.php?f=55
> It's a very informative site for DVX and HVX issues.
> Ken Willinger
> http://homepage.mac.com
>
> Larry, Darryl and Darryl wrote:
> > I'm putting together a FOV chart for various formats and stared one
for
> > the new Panasonic AG-HVX200.
> >
> > As I'm sure many of you now, the chip is 1/3" (16:9), and the widest
focal
> > length on the lens is 4.2 mm. In the manual Panasonic lists this as
the
> > equivalent of a 32mm lens on a 35mm Camera (I presume they mean a
still
> > camera which has a gate of 24mm*36mm -- or 1.5:1).
> >
> > I created a spreadsheet using standard FOV calculating formulae, and
> > accurately determined FOV for 16mm, Super 16, 35mm MP, etc. But when
I
> > entered the gate/focal-length details for the AG-HVX200, I got a FOV
of
> > 80+degrees -- dramatically different to what the Panasonic Manual
says. I
> > assumed a problem with my trig/FOV calculations, but I plugged the
> > Aperture/Ratio/Focal length into 3D Studio Max and got exactly the
same
> > results. I checked this with Horizontal, Vertical, and Diagonal FOV.
> >
> > Any idea why this is? I don't have access to an HVX200, so I can't do
a
> > hands-on investigation. I e-mailed Panasonic tech-support, but no
reply.
> > It may seem like a minor detail, but for things like CGI, Camera
matching
> > etc, it is very important.
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > --
> > --Larry, Darry, and Darryl
> > To reply directly remove "nothpam" from bexley@videotron.nothpam.ca
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|