|
|
Posted by RS on 10/05/69 11:49
NoNoBadDog! wrote:
> "John" <Johnnospam@spamex.com> wrote in message
> news:D56dne_1ALQnKx3ZRVn-ug@comcast.com...
>
>>NoNoBadDog! wrote:
>>
>>>"John" <Johnnospam@spamex.com> wrote in message
>>>news:FdKdnUWit8WFAB3ZnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>
>>>>NoNoBadDog! wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"Ralf Hutter" <yowsa@mindblown.net> wrote in message
>>>>>news:s0qv72dd32uhi92ok0ccbr17ifgafkkhdk@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>One more thing, asshole....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>SHUT THE FUCK UP.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You are a clueless cock-sucking leftist whore.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Bobby
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Gosh Bobby, you've really impressed me with your staggering
>>>>>>intelligence!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Tell us more---- say, What is the meaning of life, the universe,
>>>>>>and everything? I bet you know!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>JT
>>>>>
>>>>>The meaning is that I don't have to sit back and let idiots claim
>>>>>whatever they want. Sometimes you just have to call them as you see
>>>>>them. One of the wonderful things about this country is anyone can
>>>>>post just about anything, and I can respond the way I see fit. You
>>>>>don't have to agree with me. debate is wasted on some people...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Bobby
>>>>
>>>>You call what you do a debate?
>>>>
>>>>"If you hate America, I have only one simple request. Leave. "
>>>>One more thing, asshole....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"SHUT THE FUCK UP."
>>>>
>>>>"You are a clueless cock-sucking leftist whore."
>>>>
>>>>This is your fuel?
>>>>
>>>>I have known a few Clueless hypocrites in the past and now in the
>>>>present.
>>>
>>>No. I did not call that a debate. Some rabid individuals cannot
>>>debate, as they are too close-minded.
>>>The idiot I was responding to accused me and every American soldier of
>>>intentionally killing mothers and children. He stated he hated
>>>America. I was offering him a chance to improve his life...if he is
>>>not happy here, he should leave.
>>>
>>>I cannot understand why anyone would defend some brain damaged
>>>clueless idiot that makes claims he cannot support. The response was
>>>personal to that person. If you don't like it, don't read it. you
>>>have that choice, just as I have the choice to tell him to leave if
>>>he is not happy here.
>>>Bobby
>>
>>It should be clear to all by now that there are ones that will always be
>>misguided including the ones that have power and weapons. Nothing new
>>here. I would suggest that you get used to this as it is only just begun.
>>
>>I hope you have other interests like regular vacations out of this country
>>as that too will soon change.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> John;
>
> There are misguided ones that can be reasoned with. The OP one could
> not. I have zero tolerance for anyone telling me that I have killed women
> and children. I can stand before anyone and say that those that I killed
> were most definitely not women and children. I am not required to respond
> politely to someone who ignores facts and continues to attack me personally
> and accuse me of things that I have not done.
>
> I do enjoy frequent trips outside the country. I keep my diplomatic papers
> and passport up to date.
>
> I am in favor of greater travel restrictions, both in and out of this
> country. Honest folks wont be affected by a comprehensive set of guidelines
> governing travel. It will reduce the number of illegal's entering this
> country.
> It will reduce the number of people taking technology, services and money
> out of the country.
If this then is the case, you therefore must support restirictions on
companies moving factores and therefore technology, services and money
out of the country.
If you support tarrifs on incomming goods, you will first need to submit
a 10 page report on the history of tarrifs.
> I have no fear that the government will someday not allow me to travel.
>
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|