|
|
Posted by BrianEWilliams on 06/07/06 20:26
Peter wrote:
> > For the longest time, the US 500 pound gorilla was what was keeping the
> > place from getting on with the civil war they were always going to have.
> > The hope was that we could get a new functionion goverment in place that
> > would mitigate the chaos. They seem to have got tired of waiting. It
> > dosen't help that we disbanded the army at the very start and that their
> > government has more in common with the clown sideshow at the circus.
>
> I don't believe they are going to have civil war if we didn't step into
> their business. Saddem Hussien is bad. No doubl of it! But at least he could
> maintain some kind of order. Now it is chaos. It is the simple rule of less
> evil. It is a very bad bad decision going into Iraq and someone should be
> resposible for that!
>
> I am always pissed off when someone saying we are helping them. It is better
> now. They have democracy now, etc, etc. It is bullshit! We just make things
> worse there and here. We can do better by donating those billions of dollars
> than this and not losing 2 thousand souls in Iraq.
If Iraq is in "chaos" as you suggest, why is the violent death rate in
Iraq much lower than in Washington D.C.? This, after all, was the
original post. Let's deal with that reality before we move on. Please
tell me why Iraq is in chaos, and Washington D. C. is not. If you
can't do this, then I don't think you have much of a case.
The very simple fact is that most of the news media are virulently
anti-war, anti-Bush, and anti-American. They portray everything in
Iraq in the worst possible light in order to harm Bush and America.
When inconvenient facts, like the subject of this post, come up, they
react violently and change the subject, much like you are doing.
Sorry this is in so many video newsgroups, but as many of you are
probably in the left-wing media, maybe it is important for you to hear
opposing points of view for a change. In any case, it is easy enough
to ignore a thread if you want to.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|