|
|
Posted by Justin on 06/08/06 20:12
Richard C. wrote on [Thu, 8 Jun 2006 12:35:46 -0700]:
> X-No-archive: yes
>
> "Justin" <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote in message
> news:slrne8gp7s.shr.nospam@debian.dns2go.com...
>> Richard C. wrote on [Thu, 8 Jun 2006 07:45:14 -0700]:
>>> X-No-archive: yes
>>>
>>> "Justin" <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote in message
>>> news:slrne8dr1e.l2a.nospam@debian.dns2go.com...
>>>> Richard C. wrote on [Wed, 7 Jun 2006 07:12:25 -0700]:
>>>>> X-No-archive: yes
>>>>>
>>>>> "Justin" <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:slrne8chsb.h76.nospam@debian.dns2go.com...
>>>>>> west488@yahoo.com wrote on [6 Jun 2006 19:59:11 -0700]:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> YAHOO AUCTIONS
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fix your sig
>>>>>
>>>>> ===========================
>>>>> Fix your eyes.
>>>>> His sig works just fine.
>>>>
>>>> The sig quoted above was not just fine. If you don't know what you're
>>>> talking about shut up
>>>
>>> ==============================
>>> I know exactly what I am talking about.
>>> It looks fine. That is a fact and the truth.
>>> If it looks "wrong" to you, tough shit!
>>>
>>
>> Talking out of your arse again.
>>
>> The sig delimeter was 66% incorrect. It was just [--] instead of [-- ]
>>
>> Now, go prove you're a moron elsewhere.
>
> =============================
> That merely demonstrates that you are way too anal!
Or that perhaps, with the standards in place, newsreaders are able to
differentiate between content and signature. Imagine that. With
different colours and everything.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|