|
|
Posted by aylaway on 06/08/06 20:31
Justin wrote:
> Richard C. wrote on [Thu, 8 Jun 2006 12:35:46 -0700]:
> > X-No-archive: yes
> >
> > "Justin" <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote in message
> > news:slrne8gp7s.shr.nospam@debian.dns2go.com...
> >> Richard C. wrote on [Thu, 8 Jun 2006 07:45:14 -0700]:
> >>> X-No-archive: yes
> >>>
> >>> "Justin" <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:slrne8dr1e.l2a.nospam@debian.dns2go.com...
> >>>> Richard C. wrote on [Wed, 7 Jun 2006 07:12:25 -0700]:
> >>>>> X-No-archive: yes
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "Justin" <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote in message
> >>>>> news:slrne8chsb.h76.nospam@debian.dns2go.com...
> >>>>>> west488@yahoo.com wrote on [6 Jun 2006 19:59:11 -0700]:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> YAHOO AUCTIONS
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Fix your sig
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ===========================
> >>>>> Fix your eyes.
> >>>>> His sig works just fine.
> >>>>
> >>>> The sig quoted above was not just fine. If you don't know what you're
> >>>> talking about shut up
> >>>
> >>> ==============================
> >>> I know exactly what I am talking about.
> >>> It looks fine. That is a fact and the truth.
> >>> If it looks "wrong" to you, tough shit!
> >>>
> >>
> >> Talking out of your arse again.
> >>
> >> The sig delimeter was 66% incorrect. It was just [--] instead of [-- ]
> >>
> >> Now, go prove you're a moron elsewhere.
> >
> > =============================
> > That merely demonstrates that you are way too anal!
>
> Or that perhaps, with the standards in place, newsreaders are able to
> differentiate between content and signature. Imagine that. With
> different colours and everything.
So go prove you're a moron elsewhere and quit SPAMMING us
with your OFF-TOPIC BULLSHIT.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|