|
|
Posted by Roy L. Fuchs on 06/10/06 05:32
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 08:15:55 -0700, "Richard C." <post-age@spamcop.net>
Gave us:
>X-No-archive: yes
>
>"Roy L. Fuchs" <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote in message
>news:oqqh825gq9vngihbak5efjvvacc2s35qki@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 8 Jun 2006 12:24:01 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>>
>>> Unless DIVX stayed theoretical and never entered
>>>the market, it was obviously a competitor.
>>
>> It was a competitor ONLY to the rental markets. D'OH!
>>
>> It was in no way any danger to the DVD format... ever. E V E R !
>=======================
>That is pure bullshit!
>
>It was a competitor and a danger from day one!
>Some studios were not releasing DVD versions - only diVX crap!
>It was indeed a factor in holding DVD back at the beginning.
>Once diVX folded, DVD took off like wildfire and became the fastest
>growing consumer product ever!
Bullshit. I was buying DVDs and ONLY DVDs when DIPSHITiVX came out.
I had no intention of EVER buying one the target demographic was
rentaltards anyway, which I never was.
Turns out, even rentaltards were wise enough not to jump on that
bandwagon, so it was dead and maimed from the starting gate, and we
STILL shoot dead horses. Watch BluRay get shot as it has already been
maimed. Hasn't even entered the fucking paddock.
>
>HD DVD (both versions) will not do the same.................
Don't shit yerself, sonny.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|