|
|
Posted by FatKat on 06/12/06 05:48
ZnU wrote:
> In article <1150078008.024852.119950@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> "FatKat" <robynari@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > ZnU wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > They're
> > > significantly larger, hold less music (unless you feel like carrying
> > > around 90 CDs, to match the capacity of a 60 GB iPod), and have vastly
> > > inferior user interfaces.
> >
> > I've held both iPods and CD players - both can be held with one hand -
> > so "significantly larger" is just plain wrong.
>
> You're either trolling, or you're just nuts. Either way, it's a waste of
> my time.
Must be trolling - isn't that always the easiest answer for dupes like
you? Steve Jobs sold you a bag of goods, and if there's somebody else
out there who won't bend as easily as you, he must be a troll. Face
it, nothing you've said about iPod justifies the outrageous sums that
owners have to shell out, unless you're either too lazy or just overly
challenged by something as prosaic as a CD player.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|