|
|
Posted by Rick Merrill on 06/12/06 00:31
John wrote:
> "Richard Crowley" <rcrowley@xpr7t.net> wrote in message
> news:128oa5h8el3j3ba@corp.supernews.com...
>
>>Just observing that you get more bang-per-buck with
>>a cheap MD recorder in the pocket than with any
>>"budget" toy-plastic wireless mic. I am fortunate
>>to have re-invested my money into reasonably good
>>wireless mics, but I rememeber when I was trying to make the most logical
>>choices on near-zero
>>budgets. This is only an option here in the era of inexpensive
>>computer-based NLE video post
>>produciton. And with the changing frequency
>>spectrum assignments, and the explosion of RF
>>devices that people carry around with them,
>>cheap wireless mics are becoming even less
>>attractive (if that is even possible).
>>
>>OTOH, I have learned (the hard way) that we must
>>now *require* everyone on-set to turn OFF their
>>cell phones, Blackberry's, etc. Even wired mics
>>are susceptable to the pseudo-random transmssions
>>of a cell-phone in the pocket of the talent.
>
>
> Is it feasible to make a digital wireless mic based on WiFi (802.11)
> technology?
> With WiFi, frequency conflict shouldn't be a problem (interferences reduces
> throughput but audio requires very little bandwidth, especially if digitally
> compressed), the receiver can handle multiple streams, and the components
> are cheap. But no such product exist. Wonder why.
>
>
>
I just saw that Sony has a Bluetooth wireless mic - anyone try it?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|