|
|
Posted by NRen2k5 on 06/13/06 10:53
RichardK wrote:
> NRen2k5 wrote:
>> Jim wrote:
>>
>>> In article <Kwujg.26732$G97.418555@weber.videotron.net>, NRen2k5 wrote:
>>>
>>>> John McWilliams wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Jim wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> NRen2k5 <nomore@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No. Because regardless, there is that illegal lock-in.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Time for you to put up or shut up. Show *exactly* how it is illegal.
>>>>>> Cite the *exact* law that's being broken.
>>>>
>>>> I'm an electrical tech, not a fuckdamn lawyer. I ALREADY linked you
>>>> to the Wikipedia articles on anti-competition law and vendor
>>>> lock-ins, which you not surprisingly had nothing to say about.
>>>
>>>
>>> What did you expect? You cited *Wikipedia* for fuck's sake!
>>>
>>> Cite the exact law, not just generalisations based on your own personal
>>> feelings.
>>
>>
>> Hire a lawyer if you want to find the exact law. I am now a lawyer.
>
> Find the exact law if you want to do something other than repeat
> baseless accusations you have no understanding of. If you cannot cite
> the exact law, then you cannot prove that it is illegal, and therefore,
> you're just stating opinion, and your opinion is a: wrong, and b: has no
> basis in fact.
It will be up to the courts to decide when it comes to that, which it will.
- NRen2k5
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|