|
Posted by Jay G. on 06/14/06 11:57
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 05:20:51 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:55:34 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>
>>On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 00:00:46 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:11:55 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>>>
>>>>Think of it, Intel selling their PC chips for *more* than PCs! I bet
>>>>you'll try to claim that 80386 and 80486 chips weren't PC microprocessors
>>>>either.
>>>
>>> Very few ended up in embedded applications. Not like the 186 did.
>>
>>Let's see:
>>
>>91,700 hits for "80486 embedded"
>>
>>128,000 hits for "80386 embedded"
>>
>>71,100 hits for "80286 embedded"
>>
>>48,000 hits for "80186 embedded"
>>
>>Looks like all the later Intel microprocessors won out over the 80186 in
>>terms of embedded applications.
>>
> I'd be willing to bet that 99% of those are SBCs ...
Okay, I take that bet. Prove it.
And since when do SBCs not count as embedded?
1,750,000 hits for "SBC embedded"
-Jay
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|