|
|
Posted by Roy L. Fuchs on 06/15/06 04:14
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 07:09:44 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 00:05:32 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:13:12 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>>
>>>On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:08:03 -0400, Bill wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Name *any* DVD that *ever* needed a firmware upgrade to play DVDs
>>>>> correctly.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.dvdfile.com/news/special_report/production_a_z/toshibafirmwareupgrade.htm
>>>
>>>Ha! A Toshiba! So this is just par for the course for them.
>>>
>> More likely what we are seeing is a cutting edge implementation.
>
>Not really, DVD players have been capable of firmware upgrades for years
>now. They a hardly ever officially used though, since most manufacturers
>don't ship defective products.
>
>> What once required a trip to the shop now happens from a connection
>> within the consumer's home.
>
>Wow! I could download and burn to a CD a firmware upgrade for years now,
>again. It looks like a number of consumers are still having to bring the
>Toshibas back to the shop though.
>
>> For all my retarded ass knows,
>
>Fixed.
>
>> it is the NEC drive in the case
>> that got the firmware update, and it is all stored on the micro-drive
>> on my system board.
>>
>> So that shoots your "Toshiba can't design it right" crap right in
>> the head... boy.
>
>Yes, hypotheticals are scary. If they can't catch a drive error, then they
>didn't properly test their systems. And if the drive was used in their
>final *design* of the machine, then it is a fault of their *design*.
>
You couldn't be more wrong. JVC made VHS tape transports for
decades for ALL the OEMrs out there. Many of their designs had flaws
in them that did not show up until they were well into their service.
Try again, dumbfuck.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|