|
|
Posted by doc on 09/25/34 11:50
is there such a thing as real time, no render anywhere in NLE's?
drd
"Gary Eickmeier" <geickmei@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:_Cnkg.20102$Ui7.7023@tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
>
>
> Pat Horridge wrote:
>> "Gary Eickmeier" <geickmei@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:gJ1kg.17292$Ui7.16104@tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
>>
>>>
>>>doc wrote:
>>>
>>>>nice review. i do understand completely. thanks for the input.
>>>>sometimes it helps to hear someone else say it, "know what i mean?" i
>>>>tell myself don't even think about it, go for all the gutz ya can afford
>>>>and then some, that is . . stretch to the hilt, but then i forget why.
>>>>you said it in a nutshell, "6 mos" that's about the size of it too.
>>>>then, there'll be something new coming along that in 18 months will be
>>>>unusable by anything on the market, huh?
>>>
>>>Hold on a minute. This sounds a lot like the megapixel race.
>>>
>>>If the computer does the job for you now, it will do the job for you in
>>>18 months as well - regardless of what comes out next. This is similar to
>>>worrying about how many megapixels the next generation of cameras will
>>>have. If 6, 8, or 10 are doing the job for you now, then they will be
>>>just as good 10 years from now.
>>>
>>>The only factor in video worth worrying about is the ability to handle
>>>HD. So find out which systems can do that, and then get one of those and
>>>edit. HD won't be replaced for a long time.
>>>
>>>Gary Eickmeier
>>
>>
>> True but the speed with which you can do the edit is an important factor
>> if you charge for that time.
>> A low mega pixel camera takes the pictures at the same rate as a high
>> one.
>> A slow old computer will just not process effects and render and export
>> as fast as a newer one.
>> This is compounded by the fact that some people will have the newest
>> fasted kit and when a Client has used their kit they will soon get
>> frustrated when moving onto slow kit. They then start to moan and
>> ultimately they vote with their feet.
>> It is a fine balance of course. It's not always best or most sense money
>> wise to get the very fastest. Often one down from fastest is cheaper and
>> almost as good. I prefer to stay one step behind the bleeding edge if I
>> can.
>
> Once you get to real time preview and no rendering required, there is
> nothing more to gain. Maybe a hard drive camcorder.
>
> Gary Eickmeier
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|