|
|
Posted by Buchetamo on 10/10/14 11:50
"Ken Maltby" <kmaltby@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:ZJudnaFPb6dXuQ_ZnZ2dnUVZ_qednZ2d@giganews.com...
>
> "Bob" <spam@uce.gov> wrote in message
> news:44918823.11455546@news-server.houston.rr.com...
>> On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 08:41:14 -0500, "Ken Maltby"
>> <kmaltby@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>>>> How silly of me to think that "Main" meant "Root" and not "Title".
>>
>>> The "Main" menu in TDA is the top menu that lets you select
>>>the from VTS/Titles (which are described as tracks in TDA).
>>>So it could be described as a menu of Titles, or the Title Menu."
>>
>> Then it should be called the Title Menu and not Main Menu, which
>> implies the conventional Root Menu. In addition, there should be a
>> provision for creating a Root Menu for those who want one.
>>
>> BTW, TDA does have a separate "Track Menu" which according to you
>> would be applicable to "VTS/Titles (which are described as tracks in
>> TDA)". That reinforces the belief that "Main Menu" refers to the
>> conventional Root Menu and that "Track Menu" refers to the
>> conventional Title Menu.
>>
>> I have never used the TDA "Track Menu" so I have no idea what happens
>> when you do use it.
>>
>> --
>
> I could quote the third paragraph of my first reply, where I described
> the track menu. ( The one which you said you were aware of what I
> described.) But given this post, I have to think this discussion is a
> lost
> cause. Call things whatever you want, have whatever "belief" you wish.
> TDA will use the terms as they have been, as will the other programs,
> you can feel that TDA's use is wrong all you want, it won't change reality
> in the slightest manner.
>
> Perhaps if you had actually read, at least the first three paragraphs
> of my initial four paragraph reply, and given what I said some thought,
> you could have a better understanding. As it is you seem more
> concerned about what terms are used than about the processes
> involved.
>
> Luck;
> Ken
>
Hello Ken,
Sorry to intrude but I need your help & would appreciate your guidance: I
have installed in my computer
TMPGEnc Author 1.6 & I've thinking to upgrade to TMPGEnc Author 2.0 ($59),
but
I've been following your "announcement" on the release of TMPGEnc 4.0
Xpress ($79); perhaps I'm not the only one, but I'm confused: what is the
difference here? is the upgrade to Author 2.0 a waste of money when for $20
extra you can get 4.0 Xpress? Thanks in advance...
Buchetamo
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|