Posted by Roy L. Fuchs on 10/07/65 11:50

On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 10:05:29 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:

>On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:00:48 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 06:47:07 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>>
>>>It's not a direct correlation. Even if the cost of stamping Blu-Ray was
>>>double that of HD DVD, I wouldn't expect the final price to be twice as
>>>much.
>>
>> When did I EVER say twice as much, you fucking slimy retard?
>>
>> I said it would weigh in MORE than current disc stamping costs do.
>> PERIOD.
>
>Wow, so all you're saying is that Blu-Ray costs more to stamp than DVDs do?
>That's AMAZING! Did you figure that out all by yourself? HD DVD costs
>more than "current disc stamping costs do," so what's your point?

HD DVD costs maybe twice what a DVD costs to stamp, but I doubt it.
BluRay costs three times as much.

So what did you do with that clue? Oh, that's right... You don't
have one!

• Next in forum: Re: asj = ANNOYING SHILL (Re: Major problems with Toshiba's HD-DVD=DEAD)
• Prev in forum: Re: Bye Bye Toshiba: Samsung Ships the First Blu-Ray Player
• Thread view: Re: asj = ANNOYING SHILL (Re: Major problems with Toshiba's HD-DVD=DEAD)

[Reply to this message]