|
Posted by Jay G. on 10/07/15 11:50
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 04:27:45 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 10:05:29 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>>
>>> I said it would weigh in MORE than current disc stamping costs do.
>>> PERIOD.
>>
>>Wow, so all you're saying is that Blu-Ray costs more to stamp than DVDs do?
>>That's AMAZING! Did you figure that out all by yourself? HD DVD costs
>>more than "current disc stamping costs do," so what's your point?
>
> HD DVD costs maybe twice what a DVD costs to stamp, but I doubt it.
But you have no actual numbers.
> BluRay costs three times as much.
But you have no actual numbers.
You have *no* knowledge on how much is costs to produce each disc, whether
DVD, HD DVD, or Blu-Ray. All you know is the generalization that HD DVD
costs more than DVD, and that Blu-Ray supposidly costs more than HD DVD.
You don't know by how much though, so you have no idea if those price
differences are going to be significant.
BTW, you're wrong that the costs are going to affect the price. Amazon
already has Blu-Ray discs up for sale/pre-order, and according to this
site, their average price is less that HD DVD's.
http://www.thedvdwars.com/index.cfm
-Jay
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|