|
|
Posted by Roy L. Fuchs on 09/26/02 11:50
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 06:33:35 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 04:27:45 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 10:05:29 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>>>
>>>> I said it would weigh in MORE than current disc stamping costs do.
>>>> PERIOD.
>>>
>>>Wow, so all you're saying is that Blu-Ray costs more to stamp than DVDs do?
>>>That's AMAZING! Did you figure that out all by yourself? HD DVD costs
>>>more than "current disc stamping costs do," so what's your point?
>>
>> HD DVD costs maybe twice what a DVD costs to stamp, but I doubt it.
>
>But you have no actual numbers.
>
>> BluRay costs three times as much.
>
>But you have no actual numbers.
>
>You have *no* knowledge on how much is costs to produce each disc, whether
>DVD, HD DVD, or Blu-Ray. All you know is the generalization that HD DVD
>costs more than DVD, and that Blu-Ray supposidly costs more than HD DVD.
>You don't know by how much though, so you have no idea if those price
>differences are going to be significant.
>
>BTW, you're wrong that the costs are going to affect the price. Amazon
>already has Blu-Ray discs up for sale/pre-order, and according to this
>site, their average price is less that HD DVD's.
>
>http://www.thedvdwars.com/index.cfm
>
Hahaha.. That reference is laughable!
Where are the sales numbers for them?
The difference is less than a quarter dollar, and that is NOT for
the $30 each bluturd releases.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|