|
|
Posted by Roy L. Fuchs on 09/26/32 11:50
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 17:45:29 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 19:35:22 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 06:54:16 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>>
>>>On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 04:52:12 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
>>>> The SBC itself is NOT.
>>>
>>>http://www.applieddata.net/
>>> "Welcome to Applied Data Systems, Inc. where we know that an embedded
>>> system is more than a single board computer with a flat panel display."
>>>
>>>This site suggests it is.
>>>
>>
>> You're an idiot. Come back when you've had a few years of
>> electronics training.
>
>Only if you promise to do the same.
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-board_computer
> "Single board computers... are most commonly used in industrial
> situations where they are used in rack-mount format for process
> control or *embedded* within other devices to provide control
> and interfacing."
You missed it AGAIN. It says that they are used FOR embedded
applications. The SBC itself is NOT embedded. D'OH!
>
> "Examples of stacking SBC form factors include PC/104, PC/104-Plus,
> PCI-104, EPIC, and EBX; these systems are commonly available for use
> in mbedded control systems."
FOR USE IN... maybe you'll get it after the hundredth time.
>
>http://www.intel.com/design/intarch/papers/ECX_form_factor.htm
> "The small-form factor single board computer (SBC) has become
> increasingly important in the embedded environment. While embedded
> developers must confront space and thermal constraints, many embedded
> systems require features and performance comparable with desktop
> platforms. "
Yes, and an SBC (a non-embedded device) is commonly used to control
things in the embedded device arena. That STILL does not make it
itself an embedded device. It has to be specifically designed as
such.
>http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT6449817972.html
> "A Linux-oriented Intro to Embeddable Single Board Computers "
EMBEDDABLE!
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|