|
Posted by Jay G. on 06/18/06 11:05
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 21:44:57 -0400, Joshua Zyber wrote:
> "asj" <kalim1998@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> They can't even get 50 GB discs to work right. This argument is a red
> herring anyway. Even if these theoretical 200 GB discs could be made to
> work in a lab, the players themselves are limited to only dual-layer 50
> GB playback.
>
>> and it is backed by a lot more
>> studios (therefore, much more content available) and
>> manufacturers....
>
> Maybe true today. Let's check back in a year, shall we?
I'm sorry, but that statement invalidates a lot of your own arguments.
Problems producing dual-layer Blu-Ray discs? Check back in a year. The
price of Blu-Ray players? Check back in a year. The number of titles
available? Check back in a year.
Basically, any problem you have with Blu-Ray *now* is invalid because you
don't know what the situation will be like a year from now.
-Jay
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|