|
|
Posted by Roy L. Fuchs on 06/18/06 19:38
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 06:05:19 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 21:44:57 -0400, Joshua Zyber wrote:
>
>> "asj" <kalim1998@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> They can't even get 50 GB discs to work right. This argument is a red
>> herring anyway. Even if these theoretical 200 GB discs could be made to
>> work in a lab, the players themselves are limited to only dual-layer 50
>> GB playback.
>>
>>> and it is backed by a lot more
>>> studios (therefore, much more content available) and
>>> manufacturers....
>>
>> Maybe true today. Let's check back in a year, shall we?
>
>I'm sorry, but that statement invalidates a lot of your own arguments.
>Problems producing dual-layer Blu-Ray discs? Check back in a year. The
>price of Blu-Ray players? Check back in a year. The number of titles
>available? Check back in a year.
>
>Basically, any problem you have with Blu-Ray *now* is invalid because you
>don't know what the situation will be like a year from now.
>
Hahahahaa... You're funny. Yes, I do.
There will have been several hundred thousand HD discs sold, and
several tens of thousands of players sold.
The fact is that YOU are the twit that doesn't know where things are
going.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|