|
|
Posted by Pat Horridge on 06/20/06 11:09
"Rayne" <mineapollo@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1150716936.615978.56710@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Martin Heffels wrote:
>> On 19 Jun 2006 04:13:44 -0700, "Rayne" <mineapollo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Checked a brief section, however we exported 2 copies and the other one
>> >is fine! I was there as well so can confirm that the editor made no
>> >more changes.
>>
>> OK, but still it's a bit risky to not fully check the tape you sent out.
>
> Ok, thats interesting. I have quite a tiny dept. (1 editor at the mo)
> putting together bi weekly programmes, do you think that it would be
> worthwhile then, to dedicate some of that time to revieweing the
> entirety of their tapes? or should i maybe get a third party person to
> do so?
>
> M
>
We have a independant staff member check all client masters before they are
allowed to leave our facility.
It shouldn't ever be the editor as they often miss things or make
assumptions based on experience of the piece.
Our QC person watches the whole tape making notes against timecode as
viewed. They look for title safe picture and audio issues as well as tape
condition. They then compare their notes against the record report made by
the editor and discuss any differences with the editor. They also check
various technicl things are correct like clocks and bars etc.
We can then hand on heart verify that all delivered tapes only have issues
we know about and have been accepted by the producer.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|