|
|
Posted by Richard C. on 11/22/05 15:15
X-No-archive: yes
"Sean O'Hara" <seanohara@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3u8ndbFvm6g0U1@individual.net...
> In the Year of the Cock, the Great and Powerful Bratboy declared:
>> "Walter Traprock" <wetraprock@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:wetraprock-4D683B.22095618112005@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>>
>>
>>> i feel guilty about continuing to prefer renting and buying widescreen
>>> movies, as i support the fullscreen cause.
>>
>>
>> Why feel guilty? I mean if ppl really want movies with bits
>> missing its their choice.
>
> Unless someone gives you a FS DVD as a present.
>
> I say if someone wants to see a screen-filling image, they should set
> their player for a 16:9 screen. Any disc enhanced for widescreen TVs
> (which is pretty much all of them these days) will play with the image
> filling the screen.
==================================
Why do people keep spreading this false information?
Only a 1.85:1 or 1.78:1 movie will appear to "fill" the screen.
2.35:1 movies will NOT!
======================================
> Sure, it might make James Earl Jones look like a beanpole, but its no
> worse mutilation than pan'n'scan.
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|