|
|
Posted by Jay G. on 06/23/06 12:17
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 06:15:53 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:51:12 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>>
>>Please detail how you think Blu-Ray "sucks." It's very similar in form and
>>function to HD DVD, with the differences being either minor technical
>>differences (the largest being the different storage capacities), or
>>poilitical (who supports which format).
>
> One functions... the other doesn't.
Are you referring to the problems Toshibas had in playing HD DVDs?
> Size doesn't matter. By the time anyone that could afford a burner
> for data storage purposes wanted one, holographic storage mediums will
> blow std optical discs out of the water.
I was talking about the video discs, not any recordable format. And unless
holographic storage starts out at the same price point as Blu-Ray and HD
DVD are at that point, it won't blow them "out of the water."
> Besides 2 or 3 HD DVD burned discs is likely far cheaper than some
> lame reliability multi-layerd single BluTurd disc. I'd feel safer with
> a bunch of reliable single layer back ups than one less than optimally
> reliable multi.
And you know that Blu-Ray discs are less reliable? Where's the evidence?
-Jay
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|