|
|
Posted by Roy L. Fuchs on 06/24/06 20:32
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 07:17:24 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 03:22:58 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 07:17:08 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>>
>>>On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 06:11:38 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:38:02 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>It's interesting to note that while Blu-Ray has 4 titles with a better
>>>>>ranking than any HD DVD title, the top 10 HD DVD titles have a better
>>>>>average sales ranking than the top 10 Blu-Ray titles. It looks like the
>>>>>little dip in Blu-Ray sales over the past few days synce up with Amazon
>>>>>slightly raising the price on average for Blu-Ray titles.
>>>>
>>>> That isn't a good analysis if you ask me. Amazon's price wouldn't
>>>> be a factor.
>>>
>>>If price isn't a factor, then the price difference between the different
>>>format players wouldn't be a factor either.
>>>
>>
>> The price difference that was under discussion is near nil, as in
>> likely than a dollar.
>
>And yet there is a noticable drop in sales that correlates exactly to the
>date that the average Blu-Ray price increased.
>
You're an idiot. You keep forgetting that most of the interested
parties have already made their buys. D'oh!
IF it were a title rich market, you MIGHT have a valid point.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|