Posted by Jay G. on 06/25/06 15:50

On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 20:56:13 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs wrote:

> On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 11:45:46 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>
>>Of course, what those encoder racks encode is an uncompressed HD signal.
>>An uncompressed source is what I'd consider to be "true HD." Everything
>>else is compromised in some way, although they can still look very good.
>>
> There are no "uncompressed" sources, dumbass. When ER or CSI makes
> an HD master, THAT master is ALSO compressed, and THAT data stream is
> EXACTLY what gets broadcast.

So you're saying that any HD DVD version of HDTV sources that don't use
MPEG2 must be reprocessing the image?

> You are a fucking retard if you think they would make multiple
> levels of processing the norm.

No, they start with an uncompressed HD master and work from there:
http://www.laserpacific.com/emoryarticle.htm

> Satellite broadcasts are EXACT feeds of the MPEG2 data stream of the
> source, and the satellite transport stream is MPEG2 as well.

Which satellite broadcasts? Consumer satellites services like Dish and
DirectTV recompress the feed the same as cable companies do.

-Jay

• Next in forum: Re: asj = ANNOYING SHILL (Re: Major problems with Toshiba's HD-DVD=DEAD)
• Prev in forum: Re: Blu-ray movies outselling Toshiba's hd-dvd by a HUGE margin at Amazon
• Thread view: Re: Slow Sales (Re: Bye Bye Toshiba: Samsung Ships the First Blu-Ray Player)

[Reply to this message]