|
|
Posted by Franke Carlino on 11/24/05 04:35
On 22 Nov 2005 16:58:42 -0800, "Dr. Winston O'Boogie" <quarrymen14@msn.com>
wrote:
>
>Runnnerr wrote:
>
>> I agree with you about mono/stereo. I prefer mono myself, but your post
>> made me think about all of the fans of the American albums who were
>> having orgrams all over themselves last year when they were finally
>> released. Ugh! They still sound like shit. I can't understand why
>> anyone would listen to them in lieu of the British albums.
>
>Why not both? Take them for what they are. The American" versions were
>what "Americans" were given to listen to during those awesome days of
>Beatlemania. Maybe we like them because that's what we heard way back
>when. Mono has it's place as well, but you can't honestly say the
>stereo versions are any less exciting to hear than the mono. My first
>brush with Beatle music came from a mono AM radio, and that was all
>just dandy in those days, but the stereo version added a new dimension
>to the equation, so I say both are equally as important.
>
>DWOB
I agreee, George!
_________________________________________________________________
Peace,
Franke Carlino
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|