|
|
Posted by Mr. Tapeguy on 07/01/06 03:09
riclanders@gmail.com wrote:
> I had heard this mentioned before but didn't know quite what to make of
> it. Should this be a factor when considering a camera? Given two
> cameras of equal ability, should you opt for the larger one because it
> makes you look more professional?
I'm stunned that your asking for in-depth advice. Didn't you just want
a model number?
If you want to shoot weddings, other than picture quality I can advise
two things:
1) You'd better lighten up - weddings are loaded with very difficult
people. If you can't deal with some friendly people trying to help you
you're in for a rough ride dealing with brides and mothers.
2) Size matters. They think they hired a pro and he should have a
"pro" rig which means a BIG rig. They're wrong but I hear it time and
time again.
> The Panasonic 400 seems to beg that question ... or does it? How does
> it compare head to head with, say, a Canon GL2? Someone mentioned
> it's not very good in low-light; ok, excluding that, can you do
> professional quality work with it?
>
> I could buy the Panasonic next week or wait a week and get something
> that cost a bit more.
While I have never compared them head-to-head the Canon has much better
optics, chips and just about everything else.
> By the way, speaking of Panasonic's there's another one that strikes my
> fancy -- the AG-DVC30. Got real pumped about until I discovered it
> doesn't shoot in 16:9. I rhink that's a feature I'd want. Other than
> that, the camera seems awesome. It seems to be small but looks pro
> enough to let people know you're serious.
Then why are you looking at the 400 or a GL2? Neither has 16:9.
So there ARE some features you acutally prefer...I think.
>
> Also,someone wrote most used cameras are DOA. Is this true?
No, I said that 4 out of my last used purchases (all eBay as it
happens) were DOA. You are better off buying B-stock or demo, or at
least from a reputable dealer.
Craig
http://www.pro-tape.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|