|
|
Posted by FatKat on 07/02/06 20:32
Randroid Terminator wrote:
> D. Kirkpatrick wrote:
> > In article <R8wpg.7866$Eh1.7518@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com>,
> > "RobZip" <no time@me.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Looking for survivors........
> >
> >
> >
> > Nope. I didn't survive.
> >
> > And yes, Winmx still works for me, be it slow at times.
>
> WinMX lost. It had too many problems which
> made it unpopular and unwieldy.
Try telling that to the 100 odd in my queue. It's popular enough for
them.
> It's programmers would come to this forum
> and argue with me about its greatness and superiority to all other
> clients,
I've been on this forum for about three years and have yet to see any
of its programmers. I had seen many instances of its users arguing its
greatness and backing that up with some simple yet helpful user-tips,
which made WinMX an extremely poerful tool for DL media. What changed
things was an onslaught of n00bs who are much better at complaining
about WinMX than expending any effort at getting it to work.
> but time proved me right after all.
Yeah - time proved you and your kind to be utter clueless n00bs. Good
riddance.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|