|
Posted by P Darby on 07/05/06 11:00
"NoNoBadDog!" <Diespammers@notme.com> wrote in message
news:a9WdnXqr_sok7jrZnZ2dnUVZ_uqdnZ2d@hawaiiantel.net...
> You are wasting your time. Any video you take without the doctors
> knowledge will *NOT* be admissible as evidence in court. In order to do
> so, the videotaping would have to be ordered by a district court judge,
> would have to be accomplished by trained personnel, and the video would
> have to be maintained in law enforcements hands at all times to insure
> that the video had not been altered.
What rubbish.
The police are asking hunt monitors to video the hunt scum, to get evidence
of them illegally hunting.
Of course it's admissible.
Pete
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|