|
Posted by mmaker@my-deja.com on 07/19/06 15:41
mv@movingvision.co.uk wrote:
> That may not be quite as silly a statement as you think. Anything that
> can be achieved with FCP can also be done with Premiere Pro, especially
> in its astonishingly capable 2 version.
And you could edit a $100,000,000 feature in Windows Movie Maker: but
would you want to?
> It's a brave new and very much
> levelling world we about to enter.
I agree to some extent, but I still don't see why anyone making a movie
with that kind of budget is going to choose Premiere over the
alternatives.
Didn't they even remove the CMX EDL support in Premiere Pro? Be fun
cutting your hugely-valuable negatives without it.
Mark
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|