|
Posted by NRen2k5 on 10/16/54 11:53
DarkStar wrote:
> First Thanks to all who replied.
>
> Second: Wow this program seems to do anything you might want with tags.
>
> There is only one thing that bothers me and it has to do
> with the size of this program. Like all Windows stuff
> the executables seem to be 10X larger then necessary
> to get the job done. It is not just this program
> but most others too in all different kinds of utilities.
>
> When you make a very large program to handle
> a relatively simple idea it serves to make me wonder
> about all the things that could be going on
> that might be other then what you want.
> I can only hope the size is related to
> multimedia data and not executable codes.
> Once you run a program it can do anything at all
> to your machine that the programmers want it too
> regardless of what you the user wants.
> It could create artificial bad sectors on your hard drive and hide programs
> like a trojan horse to be activated at the descretion
> of unknown factors. But then this is just paranoia on my part.
> Being the person I am I will try it out just the same.
>
> Now i need another Utility.
> A Utility that will check the hard drive
> for bad sectors and will write obliterating
> data to those bad sectors regardless of whether
> or not any such sectors can take data.
>
> Thanx to all who replied;
> gmvoeth
Well, some people write needlessly verbose code or don't arrange it very
well. For instance if there's a section of code that gets run a dozen
times, then you'd want to write it as a function or a library and call
it a dozen times, rather than actually having the code written a dozen
times.
Another thing is, a lot of small programs are small because they have
been compressed. Some devs don't know how to compress programs or don't
bother doing so.
--
http://theunfunnytruth.ytmnd.com/
http://theunfunnysequel.ytmnd.com/
http://lolpilot.ytmnd.com/
http://peeweemisseshisbike.ytmnd.com/
http://granategranate.ytmnd.com/
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|