|
Posted by Rev. James Slaughter on 09/26/68 11:53
scooter wrote:
> "Alric Knebel" <alric@[cableone.net]> wrote in message
> news:12c1e15hdo48nba@corp.supernews.com...
> >
> > Because I've never said anything purely to make people react, you idiot.
> > I might be responding to idiots who decided to show their mug-ugly
> > faces in the tread, but I didn't post my original remarks for that
> > reason. After that, I just sort of stirred it because they just thought
> > they were so dammed clever. How about you, you fucking moron? What
> > made YOU pipe up? Was it because I was a troll, or did you believe your
> > two-cents worth would set me straight? Why did you pick the side
> > against me? You figure that out, you red-assed baboon, then you'll
> > figure out what's really going on here.
> >
> > --
>
> I don't understand.
> Nenslo took the time to explain how to calcualte the troll equation,
> determine the troll/trollee.
> It's as old as USENET.
> But you keep getting trolled, anyway.
>
> The object is to make you waste as much of your time as possible, expending
> the least amount of effort. At this point, the subject matter is totally
> irrelevant. All logic and rationality are abandoned to continue the game.
> The bait is irrellevant, as long as you keep going.
>
> I am taking a whole five minutes to explain this, because you seem like a
> nice guy, and are determined to finish last.
>
> Sadly, I have a feeling this is not over. However, when one reads the
> thread from where it became strictly tactical, it is goddam funny as hell,
> so please continue.
STUPID
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|