| 
	
 | 
 Posted by Bill Fright on 10/25/16 11:53 
riclanders@gmail.com wrote: 
> Bob Ford wrote: 
>  
>>On 21 Jul 2006 22:36:12 -0700, riclanders@gmail.com wrote: 
>> 
>> 
>>>William Davis wrote: 
>>> 
>>>>In article <1153493202.410834.326570@s13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, 
>>>> riclanders@gmail.com wrote: 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>>Ty Ford wrote: 
>>>>> 
>>>>>>On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:31:52 -0400, riclanders@gmail.com wrote 
>>>>>>(in article <1153485112.655687.178680@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>): 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>riclanders@gmail.com wrote: 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>I'm hearing the Senneiser 300 is a great mike except for its delicate 
>>>>>>>>cable which is prone to go bad if stretched. 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>Is there a similar quality mike with a more durable cable for under 
>>>>>>>>$200? 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>ric 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>May be able to answer my own question here. The Rode video mic at $149. 
>>>>>>>seems to be a much better deal and the RODE NT3-HYPER CARDIOID at $199. 
>>>>>>>seems to be better yet. 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>ric 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>If you do a lot of run and gun shooting, the VideoMic will wiggle audibly. 
>>>>>>If 
>>>>>>shooting on a tripod or slow handheld, it's very nice. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>Regards, 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>Ty Ford 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>Thanks, 
>>>>> 
>>>>>What about the RODE NT3-HYPER CARDIOID? 
>>>>> 
>>>>>ric 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric 
>>>>>>stuff are at www.tyford.com 
>>>> 
>>>>ric 
>>>> 
>>>>We're all trying to be gentle and kind here, but it's difficult because 
>>>>you keep trying to get us to validate something we're just not 
>>>>comfortable validating. 
>>>> 
>>>>In my seminars, one typical audience ³light bulb moment is when I do the 
>>>>following exercise. 
>>>> 
>>>>I'd get the audience to close their eyes - then I'd announce ³Hi, my 
>>>>name is Bill Davis and I've been making video professionally for more 
>>>>than 15 years. 
>>>> 
>>>>Then I'd ask them to open their eyes and I'd silently mouth the words ³I 
>>>>live in Scottsdale, Arizona on an old horse property the barn of which 
>>>>I've converted into a purpose-built video production studio 
>>>> 
>>>>Then I'd ask them to tell me which ³presentation mode they got the most 
>>>>information out of. AUDIO without VIDEO or VIDEO without AUDIO. 
>>>> 
>>>>The point is that in most typical videos the AUDIO track actually does 
>>>>more of the communications ³heavy lifting than does the VIDEO. 
>>>> 
>>>>If you want to rest that component of your work on an inexpensive mic 
>>>>with a suspect cable, hey man, you go right ahead. 
>>>> 
>>>>Its simply that most of us would NEVER consider any mic that didn't have 
>>>>a long, solid, verifiable track record of performance in actual field 
>>>>conditions in these circumstances. 
>>>> 
>>>>Maybe the RODE gizmo is the next great field production mic and we just 
>>>>don't know about it.  Or maybe it's a fragile gizmo with a 100% margin, 
>>>>lots of marketing bucks, and no place in any videographers bag. We don't 
>>>>know, because we haven't used it and likely NEVER WILL use it. Because 
>>>>our time and work is too important for trial and error and there are 
>>>>already time tested products that we KNOW work correctly. 
>>>> 
>>>>You want to try it out. Go right ahead. If you and a couple of dozen 
>>>>other guys start raving about it, it MIGHT earn a place in our bags - 
>>>>provided one of our EV-635s or Beyer M-58s or Sony 672s or one of the 
>>>>other couple of dozen mics that we've all had knocking around in our 
>>>>bags and that are still working flawlessly after 15 or 20 years without 
>>>>a failure gets run over by a road grader or something. 
>>>> 
>>>>Nothing wrong with asking these kind of questions. 
>>>> 
>>>>Nothing wrong with not taking the answers and doing it your own way, 
>>>>either. 
>>>> 
>>>>You want to learn though your own trial and error - have at it. 
>>>> 
>>>>Most of us had to at some point. 
>>>> 
>>>>Welcome to the club. 
>>> 
>>>Not to put too fine a point on on it, but the people at  Dvcreators.net 
>>>have now think the 
>>>RODE Videomic at $149 offers more value than the  Senneiser 300 at 
>>>$199. They, in fact, no longer recommend the Senneiser 300. 
>>> 
>>>Is your point I should ignore this and select the Senneiser 300 over 
>>>the Rode anyway? 
>>> 
>>>ric 
>> 
>>My Gawd man, how many different people and how many different ways 
>>does someone have to say it to you. 
>>If you have your heart set on it, buy it..... 
>> 
>>Bob Ford 
>>Images In Motion 
>>www.imagesinmotion.com 
>  
>  
>  
> When question, Bob: Are you off your medication again or is it just 
> that time of the month? 
>  
> ric 
>  
 
well it looks like the amature just burned his trial membership with the  
experienced players. Actually I thought you guys treated ric pretty well  
considering he didn't appear to actually understand anything you guys wrote. 
 
bill
 
  
Navigation:
[Reply to this message] 
 |