|
|
Posted by gregfarr on 07/24/06 19:40
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:59:06 +0100, "Hammerer" <Hammerer {AT}
Hammering {DOT} com> wrote:
>
>"tel" <yesio@arro.com> wrote in message news:4ih6tvF3q4euU1@individual.net
>>
>> "Hammerer" <Hammerer@Hammering.com> wrote in message
>> news:oeqo3tfi8wp7bqt.210720061742@Hammering4Ever...
>> >
>> > "user" <user@localhost> wrote in message
>> > news:44c05ded$0$9213$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk
>> > >
>> > > "DB_Story" <DB_Story@att.net> wrote in message
>> > > news:u6idnSar2JltCiDZnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> > >
>> > > > Is there any way to know how many simultaneous users
>> > > > are on the WinMX network these days?
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Not an easy thing to determine as far as I'm aware. I'll take
>> > > a wild guess that an average number of users simultaineously
>> > > connected be in the region of 100,000 - 150,000. These
>> > > numbers could be significantly wrong though (higher or lower).
>> > >
>> >
>> > Erm .......... yes. Or, *exactly* 100,000, or 150,000. It could happen.
>> >
>>
>> Never seen you sharing any songs mate?
what's with the mate, Mate?
>>
>
>No, mate? Well, mate, I don't really use the 'Hammerer' name, mate, on
>WinMX, mate. I use many identities, mate. "CD HOUND", for instance, mate.
>Though, to be honest, I don't share much under that name, especially
>classical or heavy rock music, mate.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Greg
http://gregsplace.50megs.com
http://www.picturetrail.com/fugitive1
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|