|
|
Posted by Al on 07/26/06 19:47
> However, lately I'm wondering whether this is actually a bit old
> fashioned.
Nope. 192CBR is fine. If you like it, stick with it. And 192CBRMP3s are
supported by *everything* these days, so why marginalise yourself by going
for the 'flavour of the month' format?
> Secondly, how are people's experiences with FLAC - this looks pretty
> good for not throwing away data, but getting some file compression.
I know some folk that use FLAC, but why worry about disk space these days?
Don't end up as a 'Betamax' user for the sake of a few $$$ for some cheap
HD storage :-)
Al.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|