|
|
Posted by jayembee on 12/04/05 04:04
Jeff Rife <wevsr@nabs.net> wrote:
> jayembee (jayembeenospam@snurcher.com) wrote:
>> "Curtin/Dobbs" <curtin-dobbs@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Went to see HP4 last weekend and it seemed to be
>>> anomorphic widescreen (2.35-to-1).
>>
>> Not anamorphic. Super-35.
>
> I'm pretty sure it *was* anamorphic by the time he saw it,
> as Super35 isn't used for prints. You don't get the
> anamorphic filming artifacts (oval lens flare, etc.), but
> there are things which can clue you in to the
> fact that a funky lens is involved in the projection.
All true, but I thought it was worth being pedantic.
-- jayembee
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|