|
|
Posted by Phat Bytestard on 08/08/06 05:24
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:01:51 -0700, "Alpha" <none@none.net> Gave us:
>
>"Gary" <GParent@rocketmail.com> wrote in message
>news:BmRBg.1797$f8.82@trndny09...
>> http://www.highdefdigest.com/feature_blurayvshddvd_firstcomparison.html
>>
>>
>>
>> "porky" <news@dvdlibrary.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:rtCdnVJFwdIgs0rZRVnyvA@bt.com...
>>> Looks like bluray is not quite the holy grail that we were led to
>>> believe.
>>> It's lacklustre launch passed quite unnoticed after all the hype, nothing
>>> like the scale of enthusiasm or take-up of HD-DVD.
>>> thanks
>>> HD-DVD UK
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>But when will the computer RW drive for HD DVD arrive? It is already out
>for Blu Ray.
It's already out for HD DVD as well.
I wouldn't trust BluTurd. They can't even get stamped discs to read
correctly, and you want it to deal with the contrast ration of a
"burned disc"? Sure, bub... You keep thinking they are viable.
>I am actually a 'fan' of HD DVD on several levels...but I am perplexed at
>this important point. I read something about a $4k set top recorder.....I
>think that is dumb. Why even release it?
You will be able to have the medium as a data storage device. You
will see resistance to any device that would be able to record hi
resolution media. That's precisely why all analog links are scaled
down.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|