|
Posted by GMAN on 08/10/06 20:57
In article <slrnedn5he.m2q.aznomad@ip70-176-155-130.ph.ph.cox.net>, AZ Nomad <aznomad@PmunOgeBOX.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:03:08 GMT, GMAN <not@home.now> wrote:
>
>
>>In article <44db2834.87945187@news-server.houston.rr.com>, spam@uce.gov wrote:
>>>On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 17:00:22 GMT, AZ Nomad <aznomad@PmunOgeBOX.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>And what you'll get is a compound that is unable to remove any scratch
> large
>>>>>>enough to bother any working player and you'll get a supply that is only
>>> enough
>>>>>>for about ten disks. However, you will get that special feeling of pride
>>> that
>>>>>>comes from spending too much as the kit will run about four times the tin
> at
>>>>>>the auto parts store.
>>>
>>>>>Use toothpaste.
>>>
>>>>Do nothing. You'll get the same results.
>>>
>>>Are you saying that the only effective repair agent is automotive
>>>rubbing compound? I have some in the garage - I will have to try it.
>>>
>>>But I would still like to have one of those contraptions because they
>>>are not messy to use.
>>>
>>>
>>The main thing about these motorized cleaners is that they make sure to not
>>clean the disk in the wrong direction. In other words they dont clean in a
>>spira pattern and make things worse.
>
>Unless you're using a green scotch pad, you won't make matters worse. The
>idea is that you're removing scratches, not introducing new ones. The best
>way is to run in a circular fashion. Rubbing only tangentally won't work as
>well.
You do NOT want to work any disk cleaning in a circular pattern on the disk.
Best is to wipe from the center of the disk outwards.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|