|
|
Posted by Bob on 08/11/06 11:56
On 10 Aug 2006 14:30:59 -0700, "FatKat" <robynari@juno.com> wrote:
>Actually, it's the enforcement of laws that makes them binding, and
>that's where the judges come in.
Spoken like a true fascist. Justice at the end of a gun barrel. The
Chairman would just love you.
>> Dio you want the judiciary to make the laws?
>Actually, they've been doing that for ages. It's called "precedent".
That is not the same as law.
Wikipedia:
Precedent: In law, a precedent or authority is a legal case
establishing a principle or rule which a court may need to adopt when
deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts. The term may
also refer to the collective body of case law which a court should
consider when interpreting the law. When a precedent establishes an
important legal principle, or represents new or changed law on a
particular issue, that precedent is often known as a landmark
decision.
Nowhere in that definition is there any mention of precedent being the
same as a law.
>Many judges are elected.
I am talking about federal judges. They are the ones who rule on
federal law.
--
"One must realize that the world is a network of real and virtual
combat zones where the stakes are high, struggle is the primary
mode of being and only total victory is acceptable.
-- Sun Tzu, "The Art Of War"
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|