|
|
Posted by Bob Ford on 09/26/36 11:56
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:03:35 -0400, "Mike Kujbida"
<kujfamNoSpam@xplornet.com> wrote:
>Gary Eickmeier wrote:
>> Bob Ford wrote:
>> snip <
>>> The R200 is very easy to use.
>>
>> Is that the same as the 220?
>
>
>The 220 is the successor to the 200. New & improved model??
Translation in electronics technician lingo.....
we finally have one that works :-)
>
>
>>> The software it comes with is easy to
>>> learn and does a fairly good job. You will find it is painfully slow
>>> and very much of an ink hog. Advantage is you only replace the color
>>> that is empty. My R300 is a very early model and I had problems with
>>> it after awhile because of the adapter tray. I use it very little now
>>> and ordered a couple of replacement adapters and saw that Epson has
>>> changed the design on it so maybe that problem is resolved.
>>
>> My main question was whether I would be able to still use the graphics
>> that we have been using from Fellowes MediaFace to print paper
>> labels. I think I will be able to import any graphics from any source
>> to print on the DVDs - is that right?
>
>As long as the graphics are in jpeg format (and a few others that I can't
>remember as it's my work printer), you'll be able to import them. I just
>did some DVDs today that were sent to me as a PSD (Photoshop) file. I saved
>it out as a jpeg and printed them. Worked just fine. As Bob says though,
>they are pigs on ink but other folks I know have used non-Epson ink (much
>cheaper) and it's worked ok for them.
Most of the graphics I have ever needed I have been able to import.
>
>Mike
Bob Ford
Images In Motion
www.imagesinmotion.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|