|
|
Posted by Goro on 12/09/05 16:29
NunYa Bidness wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2005 06:30:54 -0800, "Goro" <evilninjax@yahoo.com> Gave us:
>
> >OTA HDTV already shows a potential noticeable (to me) increase in
> >picture quality. HDTV right now suffers from motion artifacting, but i
> >assume this is from bitrate issue.
>
> Nope. It's the conversion that takes place for the DLP.
>
> I have a CRT style HDTV, and there are NO artifacts EVER.
>
> I go look at even the best FPDs and see it in even simple motion.
>
> General Instrument (the inventors of the HDTV format) used 16
> processors on their motion estimator board alone. I know that TVs
> cannot incorporate that.
>
> You will all see huge improvements when companies like faroudja (sp)
> start using cell cpus in TVs for such things as motion processing for
> the down conversion that gets done for DLP renderings. Even a
> standard LCD display sports the same problems... but not my CRT.
>
> CRTs STILL RULE! And this is one reason why. NO downconversion!
Wow. Interseting. I DO agree that CRTs (direct view) have better
picture than DLP/LCD/LCos/SCRD/etc and was a major reason i didn't buy
my DLP. BUT the size, weight of CRTs are formidable. The tradeoff is
not so bad, but it is interesting to note that the artifacting i see on
(say) NFL Crowd scenes are a result of the DLPs... I'll have to check
out a CRT HDTV sometime soon.
-goro-
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|