|
|
Posted by gregfarr on 09/08/06 05:33
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 22:57:13 +0100, "Hammerer"
<Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>
>"gregfarr" <gregfarr@oshit.comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:4811g29ilqp4i5i75oqp9a50bi14boj875@4ax.com
>>
>> On 7 Sep 2006 06:52:08 -0700, "nycram" <gvellenzer@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > gregfarr wrote:
>>
>> > > When I first installed the leech, it seemed far superior to
>> > > mxmonitor but now I find that a lot of peeps do get thru
>> > > with 0 share files, and are missed by the leeches noisy hammer.
>> > > Are there any cures for this malady?
>> > >
>>
>> > Why use a one-trick pony like leechhammer? You get the same effect
>> > when you set the minimum number of shared files in MxMoni to, say 10.
>> > You then get to enjoy all the other features of MxM.
>> > Gary
>> >
>>
>> . . . . and 2 it caused spazticity in the graphics.
>>
>nycram / gvellenzer is obviously the kinda guy that enjoys spazticity in his
>graphics, greg. We'll have to watch out for him. He's the sort of person
>that doesn't answer the question.
>>
>> You didn't answer my question; could someone think about it?
>>
>I've just thought about it, greg, and it's terrible. He didn't answer your
>question. Bad.
>
>PS
>I believe you have to tell LeechHammer to ignore 0-file sharers, otherwise
>it won't. Maybe you forgot to tell it?
It's set at 70 min, which I chose as a fair number.
Greg
http://gregsplace.50megs.com
http://www.picturetrail.com/fugitive1
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|