|
|
Posted by Sam on 09/14/06 17:26
"the dog from that film you saw" <dsb@REMOVETHECAPITALSbtinternet.com> wrote
in message news:4mte8bF7psukU1@individual.net...
>
> "POD {ҿ}" <DONT.EVEN.TRY.IT@DEADSPAM.COM> wrote in message
> news:Xns983EAE784AD64WeLovePOD@212.23.3.119...
>> Milk and cookies kept you awake, huh? Let's discuss this, you better
>> come
>> up Glenn Richards <glenn@squirrelsolutions.co.uk>.
>>
>>> I'll be even happier when they do an anamorphic version of the original
>>> theatrical version, but this will do for now.
>>
>> I'm happy with my bootleg LD transfers that are Anamorphic.
>
>
>
> no they're not!
> laserdiscs were never anamorphic - so all you have is a non anamorphic
> version which someone has resized to make it anamorphic, but with the
> level of detail of the non anamorphic one.
>
> plus it will be from a composite source - unlike this new dvd which will
> store the picture in component form.
>
> all in all, this non anamorphic one will look better.
>
> Gareth.
Presumably, the visible scan-line problem which people used to moan about
with non-anamorphic DVDs is only an issue with CRT TVs, and not on LCDs,
plasma or projectors? Is this correct?
If so, then apart from on CRT TVs, the non-anamorphic release should look no
worse than the anamorphic bootlegs for the reason given by Gareth - namely
that the bootlegs are based on a non-anamorphic (laserdisc) source.
Sam
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|